SCREEN
METHOD

THE YEAR IN DECISIONS / SUBJECT YEAR 2025

2025.
Read beyond the release.

11 substantial explainers and working guides. Follow a production question through the evidence, the workflow and the limits.

All prepared 19 September 2026. Retrospective coverage, not articles published in 2025. No interviews or independent product tests are claimed.

Explore 2026 ↗ · Search the whole journal ↗

Tools & technique

Both years ↗

2025 SUBJECT / Tools & technique

Ray2 made a shot, not a scene.

Luma’s January release is most useful when a director treats its short generations as coverage candidates with explicit joins.

Reader question: How should a filmmaker turn short Ray2 generations into an editable sequence without mistaking a model claim for continuity?

Read the evidence ↗

2025 SUBJECT / Tools & technique

An in-context edit needs an edit decision list.

Aleph’s 2025 release framed video transformation broadly. The production question is how to constrain what may change in a particular shot.

Reader question: How can an editor request a video transformation without letting a broad instruction silently rewrite the shot?

Read the evidence ↗

Craft & workflow

Both years ↗

2025 SUBJECT / Craft & workflow

First and last frame are a bridge brief.

Wan2.1 FLF2V made start and end frames explicit in 2025. The craft question is what the two images establish—and what they leave unresolved between them.

Reader question: How can an editor prepare a first-to-last-frame generation brief that survives a cut?

Read the evidence ↗

2025 SUBJECT / Craft & workflow

A generative board needs a production trail.

Adobe’s 2025 Firefly Boards launch put collaboration and generation on one canvas. For filmmakers, the board becomes useful when it can be turned into a real brief.

Reader question: How can a generative mood board become accountable previsualization rather than an untraceable pile of images?

Read the evidence ↗

Model research

Both years ↗

2025 SUBJECT / Model research

Open weights still need a workstation plan.

Wan2.1’s 2025 release gave filmmakers code and weights, not a guarantee that an unprepared local machine is a production pipeline.

Reader question: What should a filmmaker establish before treating an open video model as a repeatable local workflow?

Read the evidence ↗

2025 SUBJECT / Model research

One model, many conditions, one responsibility map.

Wan2.1-VACE combined creation and editing tasks in 2025. Its useful production lesson is to label every condition instead of treating inputs as interchangeable inspiration.

Reader question: How should a crew organize text, images, video and masks when an open model accepts several kinds of condition?

Read the evidence ↗

2025 SUBJECT / Model research

‘Consistent character’ needs a character brief.

HunyuanCustom’s 2025 paper is a research claim about multimodal conditioning; a filmmaker still has to decide what counts as the same subject in a scene.

Reader question: How can a production define subject consistency before using a multimodal customized-video workflow?

Read the evidence ↗

2025 SUBJECT / Model research

An audio-driven avatar needs a dialogue boundary.

Tencent’s 2025 Avatar paper describes multi-character, audio-driven animation. The responsible craft response is to bound speech, speaker and scene before generation.

Reader question: What should be locked before a team uses an audio-driven character-animation model for dialogue?

Read the evidence ↗

Post-production

Both years ↗